Talk:NeoOffice 2.1 Feature Comparison

From NeoWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:56, 8 August 2006 (edit)
Sardisson (Talk | contribs)
m (Talk:NeoOffice 2.0 Feature Comparison moved to Talk:NeoOffice Feature Comparison: fix bungled move)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 14:22, 16 August 2006 (edit) (undo)
Val1984 (Talk | contribs)
m (Using Images instead YES/No?)
Next diff →
Line 16: Line 16:
P.S. Very sorry. I initially wrote this in the older (NeoOffice 1.2.2) feature comparison talk page. Stupid me. P.S. Very sorry. I initially wrote this in the older (NeoOffice 1.2.2) feature comparison talk page. Stupid me.
 +
 +== Using Images instead YES/No? ==
 +
 +I think the page could be more clear if we used images instead of YES/No.
 +Like http://ipodlinux.org/Project_Status
 +
 +[[User:Val1984|val1984]] 09:22, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:22, 16 August 2006

July 20 update by Samwise :

I changed the price for Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac, since the Standard, non-upgrade edition now costs $399.95 on the online Apple Store; Microsoft's suggested price is $399.00.

I changed the number of localizations, since the number of language packs has increased in OOo 2.x; I added a warning since dictionaries are no longer included in language packs, and explained how to get them.

I changed the OOo revision for OpenOffice.org/X11, I chose 2.0.3 since all versions except 1 use a 2.0.3 codebase, feel free to change it to 2.0.2 if you think it's better.

I changed "runs on Intel-based Macs" from "No" to "Natively" for OpenOffice.org/X11, since officially supported, qa'ed builds are now available.

I updated the "Notes" section of the Neo 2.0/OOo-X11 comparison with new information.

I also removed one of the two other comparisons, since it is no longer accessible (the page must have been removed from the server). Don't know what to do with the second one though, there is no version number which could tell whether it is up-to-date or not, and I don't understand German.

I think we should also update the section for OOo/X11's partial Finder integration; I believe OOo/X11 2..x doesn't use Start OpenOffice.org anymore, but some kind of AppleScript instead, has anyone got more info about this ?

P.S. Very sorry. I initially wrote this in the older (NeoOffice 1.2.2) feature comparison talk page. Stupid me.

Using Images instead YES/No?

I think the page could be more clear if we used images instead of YES/No. Like http://ipodlinux.org/Project_Status

val1984 09:22, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Personal tools