Talk:OpenOffice.org and its Macintosh ports

From NeoWiki

Revision as of 10:53, 27 January 2005 (edit) ( | contribs) (Articles OO Differences) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 11:20, 27 January 2005 (edit) (undo) Sardisson (Talk | contribs) (Missing features) Next diff →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	James Greenidge		James Greenidge
		+
		+	== Missing features ==
		+
		+	http://www.planamesa.com/neojava/features.php#bugs (plus a couple more largely esoteric features) and printing EPS files (which is due to an Apple bug/incomplete implementation).
		+
		+	I've updated the article with that link so others can find the list of missing features in the future. --[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] 05:20, 27 Jan 2005 (CST)

---

Revision as of 11:20, 27 January 2005

> Which one should I use?

> Most Macintosh users who are looking for a good office experience should give NeoOffice/J a try.

> However, if you are more familiar with Unix and need the few OpenOffice.org 1.1.x features that have not yet been implemented in NeoOffice/J, the OpenOffice.org/X11 version is your bet.

> Hope this helps!

Greetings!

Very good summary of feature differences!

Is there any way to describe exactly what features OpenOffice 1.1 features haven't been implemented into NeoOfice?

Thanks!

James Greenidge

Missing features

http://www.planamesa.com/neojava/features.php#bugs (plus a couple more largely esoteric features) and printing EPS files (which is due to an Apple bug/incomplete implementation).

I've updated the article with that link so others can find the list of missing features in the future. --sardisson 05:20, 27 Jan 2005 (CST)