|
|
Talk:NeoOffice and Aqua
From NeoWiki
| Revision as of 15:16, 16 November 2005 (edit) ( | contribs) (note about carbon v cocoa and java) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (09:58, 20 November 2005) (edit) (undo) Sardisson (Talk | contribs) m (Talk:NeoOffice/J and Aqua moved to Talk:NeoOffice and Aqua) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| --[[User:Jake|Jake]] 09:16, 16 November 2005 (CST) | --[[User:Jake|Jake]] 09:16, 16 November 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's a prickly mess, that's what it is :sigh: I don't know how we go about saying Neo is a cocoa app (de-emphasising Java) without running into the "why isn't a Cocoa port viable" argument we also make and also explaining no, it's not Cocoa like Mail or Safari, it's 99% cross-platform C using the vcl toolkit.... we need oscar to make a new pyramid (or Patrick to stop fixing bugs and draw us a diagram!). So i tossed in the phrase "pure cocoa" a couple of times...dunno if it helps. We're chimera on steroids. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] 12:06, 16 November 2005 (CST) | ||
Current revision
techinically, i _think_ that moving from java 1.3.1 to java 1.4 moves NeoOffice from being a carbon application to a cocoa one. not an objective C cocoa application, but a Jave one... but the buzz word is "cocoa", right? ;-)
-- 09:16, 16 November 2005 (CST)
It's a prickly mess, that's what it is :sigh: I don't know how we go about saying Neo is a cocoa app (de-emphasising Java) without running into the "why isn't a Cocoa port viable" argument we also make and also explaining no, it's not Cocoa like Mail or Safari, it's 99% cross-platform C using the vcl toolkit.... we need oscar to make a new pyramid (or Patrick to stop fixing bugs and draw us a diagram!). So i tossed in the phrase "pure cocoa" a couple of times...dunno if it helps. We're chimera on steroids.
--sardisson 12:06, 16 November 2005 (CST)
