Talk:NeoOffice/J 1.1 Announcement

From NeoWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:53, 21 April 2005 (edit)
Sardisson (Talk | contribs)
(move talk over here)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 20:55, 21 April 2005 (edit) (undo)
Sardisson (Talk | contribs)
(one more)
Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
---[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] 12:13, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) (tried to eliminate the "release" and "version" appearing in every sentence. Oscar also thinks we need [http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=8230#8230 some more detailed app features included] in the announcement; I'd prefer to do this in a third-plus paragraph(s) :-) <br>+--[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] 12:13, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) (tried to eliminate the "release" and "version" appearing in every sentence. Oscar also thinks we need [http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=8230#8230 some more detailed app features included] in the announcement; I'd prefer to do this in a third-plus paragraph(s) :-)
---[[User:Ovvldc|Ovvldc]] 13:18, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) (Good work. 3rd paragraph is also a good idea. Reminds me of a journalism course: most imporant stuff first, and you should be able to clip paragraphs starting from the bottom. I suggest we work out the pros at Trinity. BTW, your box is an html table..)<br>+ 
 +--[[User:Ovvldc|Ovvldc]] 13:18, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) (Good work. 3rd paragraph is also a good idea. Reminds me of a journalism course: most imporant stuff first, and you should be able to clip paragraphs starting from the bottom. I suggest we work out the pros at Trinity. BTW, your box is an html table..)
 + 
--[[User:Knutkja|knutkja]] 15:23, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) Regarding native: Isn't it sufficent to say native, and move the X11-sentence further down? (As a more tech-oriented paragraph at the end?) Or isn't that clear enough? Neo/J is *not* OOo, so it doesn't have to say what its not doing... [Haven't edited, just asking.] :) --[[User:Knutkja|knutkja]] 15:23, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) Regarding native: Isn't it sufficent to say native, and move the X11-sentence further down? (As a more tech-oriented paragraph at the end?) Or isn't that clear enough? Neo/J is *not* OOo, so it doesn't have to say what its not doing... [Haven't edited, just asking.] :)
 +
 +
 +--[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] 15:49, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) Ahh, I was expecting a pretty CSS box like you did in Talk:Main_Page, Oscar :-)

Revision as of 20:55, 21 April 2005

--sardisson 12:13, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) (tried to eliminate the "release" and "version" appearing in every sentence. Oscar also thinks we need some more detailed app features included in the announcement; I'd prefer to do this in a third-plus paragraph(s) :-)

--Ovvldc 13:18, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) (Good work. 3rd paragraph is also a good idea. Reminds me of a journalism course: most imporant stuff first, and you should be able to clip paragraphs starting from the bottom. I suggest we work out the pros at Trinity. BTW, your box is an html table..)

--knutkja 15:23, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) Regarding native: Isn't it sufficent to say native, and move the X11-sentence further down? (As a more tech-oriented paragraph at the end?) Or isn't that clear enough? Neo/J is *not* OOo, so it doesn't have to say what its not doing... [Haven't edited, just asking.] :)


--sardisson 15:49, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT) Ahh, I was expecting a pretty CSS box like you did in Talk:Main_Page, Oscar :-)

Personal tools