|
|
Talk:Updating NeoOffice Listings
From NeoWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 00:00, 23 February 2005 (edit) Sardisson (Talk | contribs) m (Thanks!) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (11:22, 12 August 2006) (edit) (undo) Sardisson (Talk | contribs) m (fixing old link) |
||
| (One intermediate revision not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I think it would be a good idea to explain what is meant by a "NeoOffice/J Listing", why one would update it, and maybe offer some examples. I'd add this myself but I'm not quite sure.. | I think it would be a good idea to explain what is meant by a "NeoOffice/J Listing", why one would update it, and maybe offer some examples. I'd add this myself but I'm not quite sure.. | ||
| - | :How's the new text? I was presuming that anyone coming upon that page would arrive via the [[ | + | :How's the new text? I was presuming that anyone coming upon that page would arrive via the [[NeoOffice_Advocacy|Neo Advocacy]] page and would thereby understand, but clearly that's not always the case :-) —[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] |
| Ya, in my case I came via the "recent changes" page... Haven't looked at the new text yet, but I will. --W | Ya, in my case I came via the "recent changes" page... Haven't looked at the new text yet, but I will. --W | ||
| :Good changes, thanks! It was more difficult to explain intelligently and clearly than I had expected! :-) —[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] | :Good changes, thanks! It was more difficult to explain intelligently and clearly than I had expected! :-) —[[User:Sardisson|sardisson]] | ||
Current revision
I think it would be a good idea to explain what is meant by a "NeoOffice/J Listing", why one would update it, and maybe offer some examples. I'd add this myself but I'm not quite sure..
- How's the new text? I was presuming that anyone coming upon that page would arrive via the Neo Advocacy page and would thereby understand, but clearly that's not always the case :-) —sardisson
Ya, in my case I came via the "recent changes" page... Haven't looked at the new text yet, but I will. --W
- Good changes, thanks! It was more difficult to explain intelligently and clearly than I had expected! :-) —sardisson
