NeoOffice Performance Comparison

From NeoWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:14, 14 August 2008 (edit)
( | contribs)
(Added individual machines to each row to allow for more comparisons)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 21:42, 14 August 2008 (edit) (undo)
( | contribs)
(In presentation section; added individual machines to each row to allow for more comparisons)
Next diff →
Line 89: Line 89:
</tr> </tr>
-<tr {{HeaderRow}}><th align="left" colspan="4">Presentation:</th></tr>+ <tr {{HeaderRow}}><th align="left" colspan="4">Presentation:</th></tr>
-<tr {{HeaderRow}}><th align="left" colspan="4">... with a 11 slide document</th></tr>+ <tr {{HeaderRow}}><th align="left" colspan="4">... with a 11 slide document</th></tr>
-<tr><td align="left">Open by dragging from Finder to closed application (warm start)</td><td align="center">8 seconds</td><td align="center">6 seconds</td><td align="center">9 seconds</td></tr>+ <tr {{BlueRow}}>
-<tr {{BlueRow}}><td align="left">Time to complete slide show with No Transition set, using space bar to advance slide</td><td align="center">18 seconds</td><td align="center">32 seconds</td><td align="center">11 seconds</td></tr>+ <td colspan="4">Open by dragging from Finder to closed application (warm start)</td>
-<tr><td align="left">Time to complete slide show with transition set to Fade Smoothly, using space bar to advance slide</td><td align="center">35 seconds</td><td align="center">60 seconds</td><td align="center">23 seconds</td></tr>+ </tr>
-<tr {{BlueRow}}><td align="left">Time to complete slide show with transition set to Wedge, using space bar to advance slide</td><td align="center">35 seconds</td><td align="center">63 seconds</td><td align="center">20 seconds</td></tr>+ <tr>
-<tr><td align="left">Print ... </td><td align="center">13 seconds</td><td align="center">18 seconds</td><td align="center">13 seconds</td></tr>+ <td><i>- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM</i></td>
-<tr {{BlueRow}}><td align="left">Export as PDF</td><td align="center">9 seconds</td><td align="center">9 seconds</td><td align="center">n/a</td></tr>+ <td align="center">8 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">6 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">9 seconds</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr {{BlueRow}}>
 + <td colspan="4">Time to complete slide show with No Transition set, using space bar to advance slide</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr>
 + <td><i>- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM</i></td>
 + <td align="center">18 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">32 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">11 seconds</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr {{BlueRow}}>
 + <td colspan="4">Time to complete slide show with transition set to Fade Smoothly, using space bar to advance slide</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr>
 + <td><i>- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM</i></td>
 + <td align="center">35 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">60 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">23 seconds</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr {{BlueRow}}>
 + <td colspan="4">Time to complete slide show with transition set to Wedge, using space bar to advance slide</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr>
 + <td><i>- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM</i></td>
 + <td align="center">35 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">63 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">20 seconds</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr {{BlueRow}}>
 + <td colspan="4">Print ... </td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr>
 + <td><i>- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM</i></td>
 + <td align="center">13 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">18 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">13 seconds</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr {{BlueRow}}>
 + <td colspan="4">Export as PDF</td>
 + </tr>
 + <tr>
 + <td><i>- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM</i></td>
 + <td align="center">9 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">9 seconds</td>
 + <td align="center">n/a</td>
 + </tr>
</table> </table>

Revision as of 21:42, 14 August 2008

Last updated: 13 August 2008

This page attempts to provide a balanced, but by no means complete, comparison of NeoOffice's performance with two comparable office suites, StarOffice/OpenOffice.org and Microsoft, to help you make a more informed decision when evaluating office software. Some other software developers have similar comparison pages; those we are aware of are linked below.

NeoOffice 2.2.4 Patch 4 vs. OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta 2 vs. Microsoft Office 2004

Performance TestNeoOffice 2.2.4 Patch 4OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta 2MS Office 2004
General:
Price$0.00, donation requested$0.00$149.95 Home & Student Edition
Launch Time:
Launch time to active cursor in Writer document by double-clicking on application in Finder after reboot (cold start)
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 26 seconds 27 seconds 27 seconds
Launch time to active cursor in Writer document by double-clicking on application in Finder after quitting application (warm start)
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 9 seconds 8 seconds 7 seconds
Word Processor:
... with a 500,000 character document (about 130 pages long)
Open in Print Layout view, by dragging from Finder to closed application (warm start)
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 8 seconds 8 seconds 5 seconds
Open in Print Layout view, by dragging from Finder to open application (warm start)
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 1 second 1 second 1 second
Save
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 3 seconds 3 seconds 3 seconds
Page Preview
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 4 seconds 3 seconds 2 seconds
Print ...
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 24 seconds 20 seconds 64 seconds
Export as PDF
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 13 seconds 15 seconds n/a
Presentation:
... with a 11 slide document
Open by dragging from Finder to closed application (warm start)
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 8 seconds 6 seconds 9 seconds
Time to complete slide show with No Transition set, using space bar to advance slide
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 18 seconds 32 seconds 11 seconds
Time to complete slide show with transition set to Fade Smoothly, using space bar to advance slide
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 35 seconds 60 seconds 23 seconds
Time to complete slide show with transition set to Wedge, using space bar to advance slide
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 35 seconds 63 seconds 20 seconds
Print ...
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 13 seconds 18 seconds 13 seconds
Export as PDF
- Mac OS X 10.4.11, Mac Book Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo, 1 GB RAM 9 seconds 9 seconds n/a

Notes:

  • Tests were run as a newly created user with default setup
  • NeoOffice version is 2.2.4 with Patch 4
  • OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta 2 was used which is the same product as StarOffice 9 Beta
  • No other applications were running
  • Spell checking and automatic hyphenation were disabled
  • Microsoft Office pricing is for Office 2008 which has replaced Microsoft Office 2004
  • Sample 500,000 word processing document was obtained from ApfelWiki Word-Alternativen Der Test and modified to open in Print Layout view
  • Sample presentation document was obtained from NeoOffice Bugzilla and saved as a .odp file
  • Both documents above were saved in Microsoft 97/2000/XP formats (.doc and .ppt) for MS Office testing
  • Print was tested using Preview. On NeoOffice the print icon on the toolbar was used, on OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office the menu item File::Print was used due to differences in dialogs in NeoOffice and lack of a Print Preview option when using the OpenOffice.org toolbar



Other Comparisons

Additional performance (and feature) comparisons between selected office suites and word processors are available at Mellel: Competitive Comparison (redlers.com; compares Mellel 2.0 with Microsoft Office 2004, OpenOffice.org 2.0.x, and Nisus Writer Express 2.7, but not NeoOffice) and Word-Alternativen: Der Test (apfelwiki.de; compares AbiWord 2.4.5, Mellel 2.2.7, NeoOffice 2.2.1, Nisus Writer Pro 1.0, and Apple's Pages 3.0 [de]).

Personal tools